Legislature(2013 - 2014)SENATE FINANCE 532

03/27/2014 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE


Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ SB 140 AIDEA: ARCTIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM/FUND TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ SB 166 BOARD OF NURSING; NURSES TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSSB 166(FIN) Out of Committee
+ HB 199 VPSO FIREARMS TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled But Not Heard
+= HB 266 APPROP: OPERATING BUDGET/LOANS/FUNDS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+= HB 267 APPROP: MENTAL HEALTH BUDGET TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
= SB 195 POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION LOANS/GRANTS
Moved CSSB 195(FIN) Out of Committee
SENATE BILL NO. 195                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     "An  Act relating  to the  membership and  authority of                                                                    
     the  Alaska  Commission   on  Postsecondary  Education;                                                                    
     relating  to  the   Alaska  Student  Loan  Corporation;                                                                    
     relating  to  teacher   education  loans;  relating  to                                                                    
     interest   on   and  consolidation   of   postsecondary                                                                    
     education  loans;   relating  to   Alaska  supplemental                                                                    
     education  loans;  relating to  AlaskAdvantage  grants;                                                                    
     relating to  the Alaska family education  loan program;                                                                    
     relating  to  postsecondary  educational  institutions;                                                                    
     and providing for an effective date."                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
10:15:42 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
DIANE  BARRANS,  EXECUTIVE  DIRECTOR, ALASKA  COMMISSION  ON                                                                    
POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION,  DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  AND EARLY                                                                    
DEVELOPMENT,  AND  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER, ALASKA  STUDENT  LOAN                                                                    
CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF  EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT,                                                                    
expressed appreciation for the  legislation. She opined that                                                                    
it had been  two decades since a substantive  review of loan                                                                    
limits and  the policies  that guided the  state's financial                                                                    
aid administration.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
10:16:21 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Dunleavy queried  that  language in  the bill  that                                                                    
stated that  a person representing private  higher education                                                                    
had to be non-profit.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans  replied that the  membership of  the commission                                                                    
was  comprised of  representative from  both the  for-profit                                                                    
and non-profit  sectors. She said that  the language allowed                                                                    
the governor the latitude to  choose any of the institutions                                                                    
in the sector, rather than being  limited to a member of the                                                                    
board of trustees.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
10:17:31 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator Dunleavy wondered  if there was a  seat reserved for                                                                    
for-profit educational entities.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans replied in the affirmative.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
10:17:38 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator  Dunleavy  inquired  if  there  was  a  practice  of                                                                    
loaning   more   willingly   for   certain   categories   of                                                                    
educational entities.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans  responded that  that there  was not  an express                                                                    
policy relative to  the question. She said  that loan limits                                                                    
were    divided    between   collegiate    and    vocational                                                                    
institutions,    without   speaking    to   whether    those                                                                    
institutions  were non-profit  or for-profit.  She explained                                                                    
that rating agencies requested a  break out of the portfolio                                                                    
of lenders who financed their  loans in the financial market                                                                    
in order  to determine, by educational  sector, what portion                                                                    
of  the loans  when  to one  or the  other.  If a  portfolio                                                                    
reflected  a  high  proportion of  proprietary  lending,  it                                                                    
could  result in  higher overcollateralization  requirements                                                                    
because  of the  historical  trend of  higher default  rates                                                                    
associated  with  vocational  schools, particularly  in  the                                                                    
for-profit sector.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
10:20:45 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair  Fairclough requested  that  Ms. Barrans  discuss                                                                    
the 15  credit per semester  requirement in order  to access                                                                    
funds.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans  said that  the reason the  15 credits  per term                                                                    
had  been proposed,  rather than  30 credits  per year,  was                                                                    
because it  was a  student's enrollment  level on  each term                                                                    
that determined the amount of  loan that they could receive.                                                                    
She  stated  that  there  was   flexibility;  if  a  student                                                                    
enrolled  and met  the full-time  requirement of  12 credits                                                                    
for  fall,  but  then  increased their  credits  to  15  for                                                                    
spring, they  could qualify  for the  higher amount  for the                                                                    
spring term. She noted that  if a student enrolled for full-                                                                    
time of 12  credits, and did not complete the  12 credits in                                                                    
the term, the  student could make up the  credits during the                                                                    
academic year for the purpose  of continuing eligibility for                                                                    
the next year's loan. She  stated that the department worked                                                                    
to  ensure  that  students were  completing  the  number  of                                                                    
credits  that their  loan was  awarded  for without  risking                                                                    
over-awarding students,  which could be  a risk if  the loan                                                                    
were  awarded at  the beginning  of  the year  for a  higher                                                                    
amount based on the student's best intentions.                                                                                  
10:22:53 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer  queried the default rate  for Alaska student                                                                    
loans.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans replied that the  most recent published rate was                                                                    
slightly higher than  6 percent. She said  that looking back                                                                    
over the  last 10  years, the  rate had been  as low  as 3.8                                                                    
percent, peaking in 2008 and  2009 at about 7.5 percent, but                                                                    
gradually rising as the economy has recovered.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
10:23:28 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Meyer understood  that Alaska's  default rate  was                                                                    
lower than the national average.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans  replied that the  default rate for  the federal                                                                    
loan  program  was  substantially higher  than  Alaska.  She                                                                    
noted  that the  federal  loans had  no credit  underwriting                                                                    
criteria;  taxpayers  underwrite   the  credit  for  federal                                                                    
loans.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer probed the difference between the two loans.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans  responded that if  the barrower did not  have a                                                                    
credit  score of  at least  680,  they would  need a  credit                                                                    
worthy co-signer.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
10:24:14 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer discussed the new  fiscal note. He understood                                                                    
that  with  the  purchase  of  new  software  with  $460,000                                                                    
capital  dollars the  state  would see  a  savings of  $82.8                                                                    
thousand.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans replied that the  savings would be approximately                                                                    
$30,000 per  year due to  reduced software  maintenance. She                                                                    
relayed that  the current system  was inadequate  to support                                                                    
the number of student receiving student loans.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
10:25:40 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Meyer inquired if the  expense was reflected in the                                                                    
governor's FY15 capital budget.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Ms. Barrans replied that it was not.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
10:25:51 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Vice-Chair  Fairclough   offered  that  the   investment  of                                                                    
capital  would save  the state  money  in the  long run  and                                                                    
provided  a smoother  streamlined process  for the  students                                                                    
that were accessing student loans.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
10:26:25 AM                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair  Kelly  MOVED  to  REPORT   CSSB  195(FIN)  out  of                                                                    
committee   with   individual    recommendations   and   the                                                                    
accompanying fiscal  note. There being NO  OBJECTION, it was                                                                    
so ordered.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CSSB  195(FIN) was  REPORTED  out of  committee  with a  "do                                                                    
pass" recommendation and with a  new fiscal impact note from                                                                    
the Department of Education and Early Development.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
10:26:49 AM                                                                                                                   
AT EASE                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
10:30:05 AM                                                                                                                   
RECONVENED                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
CS SB 140 (LC) letter of Support_North Slope Borough.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB 140 (CL) ARPA_Polar map.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB 140 (CL) Letter of Support- City of Seward.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB 140 (CL) Letter of Support- NANA.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB 140 (CL) Letter of Support- Stephen Trimble.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB 140 (CL) Sponsor Statement.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB 140 (LC) Sectional Analysis.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB 140 (SL) Supporting Document-Planning and Infrastructure Section of AAPC Preliminary Report.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB 140(LC) Explanation of Changes.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
CSSB166 Sectional Analysis vsn R.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB 166 Backup re backgrnd checks.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB 166 changes from O to R.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB 166 Comments DeLapp.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB 166 Nursing 2014 Stats.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB 166 Support Evans.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB 166 Support Farnstrom.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB 166 Support Sanders.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB166 Sponsor Statement.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB166 Support APNO.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB166 Support Gillette.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
HB 199 2014 Sponsor Statement.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 199
HB 199 ADPS Draft Regulation Change to 13 AAC 96.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 199
HB 199 Information Hearing BBNA Testimony and Resolutions CEO Ralph Anderson.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 199
HB 199 Informational Meeting Summary 9 26 2013.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 199
HB 199 Letters--Informational Hearing--9 26 2013.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 199
HB 199 Media-Resolutions-Letters.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 199
SB 140 Letter of Support_ PT Public Policy.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
SB 140 Senate Resources mar 27.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140
SB 166 Blank CS for FIN.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB 166 SEctional vsn G.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 166
SB195 work draft version N.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 195
SB195CS(FIN)-EED-ACPE-3-26-14.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 195
HB266 Summary of Changes for HB266 version E and HB267 version R.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 266
HB 267
HB266 work draft version E.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 266
HB267 work draft version R.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 267
HB266 Amendment #1 - Hoffman-Olson-Bishop-Kelly.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
HB 266
SB140 LUKIN_SarahTestimony 3-27-14.pdf SFIN 3/27/2014 9:00:00 AM
SB 140